Putting Venus back together | posted by MD
ATLANTA (AP) -- Conservators trying to restore a 1,900-year-old statue of Venus have put their heads together with airline maintenance inspectors who usually scrutinize welds and repairs in jet engines for any cracks.

Officials at the Michael C. Carlos Museum at Emory University this summer bought the Roman marble statue and its head, which had broken off sometime in the past 170 years.

On Thursday, they enlisted the help of Delta Air Lines inspectors at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, who took X-rays of the statue and the head to try to determine where the statue has been broken before and how old repairs are holding up.

Conservators will look for rusting metal pins that might have been inserted to fix cracks. Once they establish the condition of those repairs, which could date from antiquity to as recently as 200 years ago, they will know how best to put the 4-foot-6-inch statue back together.

...The statue, by an unknown artist, is a copy of a Greek bronze sculpture that many scholars say is the most widely reproduced female statue in antiquity. While there are thousands of similar images of Venus in all sorts of sizes and materials, this restoration is significant because few statues are as large and nearly intact as this one, missing only the right arm.

"When statue pieces go down different roads, and they're recognized, bought, and put back together, it's extremely noteworthy," said Francesco de Angelis, a professor of Roman art at Columbia University. "This type of statue was incredibly popular in antiquity."
A general view is that "copying" is a technique practiced by artists that is out of date, and no longer employed. But I wonder, is it? And should it be? These are things I think about. I mean, what drove this "copying"? Were artists of the past stupid for doing so? Would their time have been better spent creating something that was not a copy, but original, as is, never been done before? And is there something informative that lie within the practice of copying that can bear fruits for contemporary artistry?
11/02/2006 |  Email This!  






©2006 Polysemy. All rights reserved.

Subscribe via iTunes

RSS   ATOM


POLYSEMY Home

see also...

Elegant Thorn Review
poetry & photography

The Bookshelf
artist paideia

The Daily Goose
blog by Matthew & Hannah Dallman



Have a comment?
Send an email to editor at polysemy dot org


Discussions we like:
Bloggingheads.tv
What's Your Problem?
Buddhist Geeks




To hear about
everything new
at POLYSEMY

       


©2006 POLYSEMY.
All rights reserved.